Showing posts with label Islamists. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Islamists. Show all posts

Sunday, November 27, 2011

Travel Warning: Don't Get Flogged In the Maldives


 Maldivian Islamic groups call for arrest of UN High Commissioner on Human Rights
Protestors gathered outside the United Nations Building in Male’ on Friday afternoon to condemn UN Human Rights Chief Navi Pillay for her criticism of the Maldivian constitution, namely its provisions endorsing flogging and mandating that every Maldivian be a Muslim.
The protestors carried signboards with angry slogans, including “Islam is not a toy”, “Ban UN” and “Flog Pillay”, and called on authorities to arrest the UN High Commisioner.
Police Sub-Inspector Ahmed Shiyam told Minivan News that the sizeable protest was contained and there were no confrontations.
“Police cordoned off the area so people could not enter the UN building or the roads leading to the building. The protest was pretty heated, but there were no confrontations or arrests,” he said.
After a break for Sunset Prayer, protesters renewed their efforts at the Tsunami Memorial.
Shiyam said police guarded the UN building during the evening protest, and kept appraised of its movements.
No concerns have been voiced to the police by the UN.
During a press conference on Thursday evening, Pillay again called for the government and the judiciary to issue a moratorium on flogging.
“Flogging is a form of punishment that is cruel and demeaning to women. I have as High Commissioner traveled to very many Islamic countries, and apart from the Maldives and one other country that practices stoning, flogging is not a practice that is condoned,” she said.
“The issue needs to be examined, and therefore I called for a countrywide discussion. It is much better if the issue is transparent and debated.”

Saturday, November 26, 2011

Muslims Exercise Free Speech in Germany ... Cops Show Support and Rip Down Israeli Flag

"Tod, Tod Israel" auf English ... "Death, Death Israel"




Israel: Child Murderers ...
Israel: Mass Murderers ...
Jews Out of Palestine ...
Death to Jews ...
Jews are Cowardly Pigs ...
Jews: Murderer, Murderer ...

Is This The Real Life ... Or Is This Just Fantasy?

The Phoney War





‘Phoney War’ is the name given to the period of time in World War Two from September 1939 to April 1940 when, after the blitzkrieg attack on Poland in September 1939, seemingly nothing happened. Many in Great Britain expected a major calamity – but the title ‘Phoney War’ summarises what happened in Western Europe – near enough nothing.
The term 'Phoney War' was first used, allegedly, by an American  senator called Borah. Winston Churchill referred to the same period as the ‘Twilight War’ while the Germans referred to it as ‘Sitzkrieg’ – 'sitting war'.
The Phoney War refers to what happened in Western Europe between September 1939 and the spring of 1940. To assume that nothing was going on in Europe would be wrong as Poland was in the process of being occupied with all that brought for the Polish people. However, in Western Europe very little of military importance did take place. In fact, so little occurred that many of the children who had been evacuated at the start of the war, had returned to their families. To many, war had been declared by Neville Chamberlain, but nothing was actually happening.
In fact, things were happening but the public in Britain were not aware of them – or very few were. The sinking of the ‘Athenia’ sent a clear message to Britain that Germany was prepared to sink passenger liners and not just ships of military importance. The sinking of the ‘Royal Oak’ also brought the war home to Britain. Such was the shock to the government of the ‘Royal Oak’s’ sinking that many people first learned about it from the broadcasts of Lord Haw-Haw
At 09.00 am September 3rd, U-30 attacked the ‘Athenia’ which was bound for Canada. U-30's commander, Lemp, claimed that he believed that the ‘Athenia’ was a naval boat as it was sailing in a zigzag manner and in the poor light he could not differentiate between a liner and a naval vessel. Of the 1,102 passengers and 315 crew, 112 died. Germany attempted to shift the blame for the attack on the British by claiming that British intelligence, on the orders of Winston Churchill, had placed a bomb on board ‘Athenia’. In fact, U-boat commanders had been ordered not to attack passenger liners and Hitlerhimself issued an order that no further attacks should be made on passenger liners unless it was obvious that they were travelling in convoy.




A survivor from the 'Athenia'

During the Phoney War, Britain was also engaged in ‘bombing’ raids over Germany – but it was not bombs that were dropped but propaganda leaflets. Sir Kingsley Wood, Secretary of State for War, called them “truth raids”. The ‘raids’ served two purposes:
Ø      The Germans would read about the evils of Nazi Germany
Ø      It was show the leaders of Germany just how vulnerable their country was to bombing raids.
Millions of leaflets were dropped over Germany. On September 3rd alone, 6 million copies of “Note to the German People” were dropped in just one night – the equivalent of 13 tons of paper. The main result of these initial raids was that the Germans stepped up their anti-aircraft batteries.
While some politicians believed that the raids served a purpose, others in the military did not.




“My personal view is that the only thing achieved was largely to supply the continent’s requirements of toilet paper for the five long years of the war.” ‘Bomber’ Harris writing at the end of the war.
“It is ignominious to wage a confetti war against an utterly ruthless enemy.” 
General Spears

It is certainly true that the general public would have liked a more robust response to the attack on Poland. If our bombers were capable of dropping leaflets, it was surmised, then they should be capable of dropping bombs on important industrial targets to let the Germans know that we meant business.




“The smoke and smell of German forests would teach the Germans, who were very sentimental about their own trees, that war was not always pleasant and profitable, and could not be fought entirely in other people’s countries.” Hugh Dalton

When the issue of an attack on the Black Forest was raised with Kingsley Wood, he replied:




“Oh you can not do that, that’s private property. You’ll be asking me to bomb the Ruhr next.”

In anticipation of the war breaking out, in August the Emergency Powers (Defence) Bill had received the Royal Assent. It brought into being




“such defence regulations as appear necessary or expedient for securing the public safety, the defence of the realm, the maintenance of the public order and the efficient prosecution of any war in which His Majesty may be engaged, and for maintaining supplies and services essential to the life of the community.”

This law brought in
Ø      The arrest, trial and punishment of anybody deemed to have gone against these regulations
Ø      To detain anybody deemed by the government to be a threat
Ø      Taking any property other than land needed by the government
Ø      Entering and searching any property
Ø      Changing any existing law if it was necessary for the war effort
Immediately the war started, the public faced a torrent of prohibitions – what they could not do – and requirements – what they had to do.
Such a move did attract a considerable amount of criticism even within Parliament. Imprisonment without trial and the effective suspension of Habeas Corpus were, indeed, controversial. Dingle Foot, MP, said that Britain was fighting two wars: Nazi aggression abroad and Nazi tendencies at home.
During the Phoney War, blackout was rigidly enforced until it became obvious that problems on the roads had to be resolved. In December 1939, Westminster allowed low-density street lighting to help solve the issue of pedestrian/road accidents. Other areas soon followed. But no night time lighting of any description was allowed within 12 miles of the south-east coast. It was only on January 22nd, 1940, that the familiar car headlamps of World War Two were introduced along with a 20 mph speed limit in built-up areas. 

Will Arab Spring Rains Fall On Israel?




Monday, November 14, 2011

Religion of Peace Hijacked Again Down Under





Melbourne: Two Muslim men in Australia, who were accused of plotting a deadly terrorist attack, have been released on parole last week, and still remain a major threat to the nation’s security. 
Police fear Australian-born Aimen Joud and Ahmed Raad still pose a threat, as there are no signs that their anti-Western beliefs changed in prison. 
“Their radical and extreme views remain a concern,” the Herald Sun quoted an investigating officer, as saying. 
“While local police will be aware of where they are living, and will keep an eye on them when they can, there is not the manpower to do it constantly,” the officer added. 
Police Association Secretary Greg Davies said it was disturbing that the pair were likely not to be watched around the clock. 
Police secretly taped Joud and Raad laughing while watching and discussing sickening jihadi video footage of Muslim extremists beheading hostages and killing US soldiers. 
Both were senior members of a home-grown terror cell run by Muslim cleric Abdul Benbrika. 
Joud, 27, and Raad, 28, who were jailed for being members of a terrorist organisation and making funds available to it, were freed eight days ago, after serving non-parole terms of just six years behind bars, the report said. 
In 2008, a heard they had refused to renounce extremist beliefs, and that they continued to ‘adhere to the philosophy of violent jihad’.

Sunday, November 13, 2011

Nail Islamists From Afar



WE have lost lives pointlessly combating Islamists on the ground in their own miserable lands. The West is smarter than that. Let's kill them from a safer distance.

Samuel Huntington died three years ago, and we still debate his idea that after the collapse of Communism, the world began splitting along cultural rather than ideological lines.
The eminent political scientist first collected his thoughts together as a provocative essay in 1993 published by Foreign Affairs magazine titled The Clash of Civilisations?
He was more certain of his ideas when expanding on them for a book three years later: The question mark had gone.
Eight years before the World Trade Centre was levelled by 19 Islamic terrorists dedicating their handiwork to the greatness of their god, Huntington saw future conflict arising from such cultural tensions and by lunchtime on September 11 many of those who remembered reading his theory thought he had seen the future clearer than Nostradamus.
But like the infamously vague and fraudulent French seer, Huntington's ideas have less purchase the further we move from 1993.
Early on the public enthusiastically took to Huntington's ideas, notwithstanding the flight of intellectuals. But components of his arguments seem profoundly correct, even if it is possible that their embrace might make them self-fulfilling, particularly the existential fight that significant parts of Islam imagine they are having with the West.
The West is not at war with Islam. We have launched a War on Terror, and the targeted terrorists are mostly Muslims, and we should kill them.
You can't negotiate with an extremist quoting the Koran as the reason he must murder your family.
We must kill him. Or her.
Nor can we negotiate with the mums and dads taking pride in their children strapping explosives to themselves to kill strangers in public places because they are envious of the fruits of advanced Western notions of democracy, education and equality.
Neither will we negotiate with those among us - right here in suburban Australia - who wish for sharia law and other sixth century accoutrements of the more primitive brand of Islam that have taken deadly hold elsewhere.
Australia is part of the arm wrestle against Islam's extremists and has troops on the ground trying to kill the Taliban in Afghanistan. More Here

Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Islamophobia: England ... Caveat Emptor!




How is it racist to oppose a fascist ideology? 

"In this scene from "Islamophobia," Tommy Robinson of the English Defence
League takes "Vanguard" correspondent on a tour of the neighborhood 
where he grew up, which he says has been taken over by radical 
Islamists. The drive quickly turns into a heated argument with a Muslim 
man passing by who recognizes Tommy."

and BTW ... USA ... Caveat Emptor too!

Friday, November 4, 2011

Jordan king pardons terror convicts


AMMAN — Jordan's King Abdullah II has pardoned 12 Jordanians described by local press on Friday as Salafists, at least six of whom were convicted on terrorism charges in 2006.
The king issued a decree on Thursday giving the 12 a special pardon, state-run Petra news agency reported without elaborating.
Independent daily Al-Arab Al-Yawm said Friday the men are Salafists, who espouse an austere form of Sunni Islam that seeks a return to practices that were common in the early days of the faith.
Of the group, Osama Abu Hazim, Hatem Nsur, Mohammad Arabiat, Yazan Hleiq, Muath Breizat and Feisal Rueidan were sentenced to 10 years for plotting to attack foreign tourists, hotels, intelligence officers and US military instructors in Jordan.
They have been also charged with having connections to Al-Qaeda.