Showing posts with label England. Show all posts
Showing posts with label England. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 21, 2011

White Trash: "I’m gonna send that kuffar bitch straight to Hell."

Groomed for sex then thrown into a canal and killed: 

White girl murdered for 'shaming' Asian family

A vulnerable teenager was stabbed and thrown into a canal to die after she brought ‘shame’ on an Asian family, a court heard yesterday.
Laura Wilson, 17, who was groomed for sex by a string of British Pakistani men, was repeatedly knifed by 18-year-old Ashtiaq Asghar.
He then pushed her into the water, using the point of the knife to force her head below the surface as she fought to stay alive.
Laura Wilson had a brief fling with near neighbour Hussain, 22, and gave birth to their daughter in June last year but he refused to accept the child was his, the court was told
Laura Wilson had a brief fling with near neighbour Ishaq Hussain, 22, and gave birth to their daughter in June last year but he refused to accept the child was his, the court was told
Asghar was furious after the young mother revealed details of their sexual relationship to his Muslim family and was on ‘a mission to kill’, the court was told.
    He exchanged a series of texts with married friend and mentor Ishaq Hussain, 22, who had also had an affair with Laura, and who the judge described as a man who regarded white girls as  ‘sexual targets, not human beings’.
    In one message, sent a day before he killed Miss Wilson, Asghar wrote: ‘I’m gonna send that kuffar (non-Muslim) bitch straight to Hell.’
    Ashtiaq Asghar admitted murdering the 17-year-old after making a dramatic plea-change mid-way through trial
    Ashtiaq Asghar admitted murdering the 17-year-old after making a dramatic plea-change mid-way through trial
    In another he wrote: ‘I need to do a mission.’ He talked of buying a pistol and ‘making some beans on toast’, a reference to spilling blood used in Four Lions, a satirical film about suicide bombers.
    Last night, Asghar was told he must serve a minimum of 17-and-a-half years after he pleaded guilty to murder and was jailed for life. Mr Hussain was acquitted of murder by joint enterprise after a retrial.
    Sentencing Asghar, Lord Justice Davis told him: ‘I take the view you came under the influence of Mr Hussain who is something of a mentor to you. 
    'He seems to have regarded girls, white girls, simply as sexual targets. He does not treat them as human beings at all. You got into that mindset yourself.
    ‘You no doubt once had feelings for Laura but treated her with contempt in the latter stages.’
    The judge added: ‘I am sure there was a plan between you and Mr Hussain and that was a plan initiated by you. 
    ‘You talked about getting out your hit list. Mr Hussain then encouraged you in it. I am quite sure he was lying when he said there was no plan.’ 
    After killing Miss Wilson he went to a snooker hall ‘without a care in the world’ and tried to hide the evidence.
    Miss Wilson was a troubled teenager who was first identified as being at  risk of sexual exploitation by British Pakistani men when she was 12.
    She had developed several links with Asian men in her home town of Rotherham, South Yorkshire.
    In 2007, when she was 13, she and her family appeared on The Jeremy Kyle Show. During the programme – about out-of-control children – her sister warned her that ‘your attitude is going to get you in big danger’. 
    Workers at a child sexual exploitation project later sent a report to social services, but no action was taken to remove her from what became a  continuing spiral of sexual abuse. 
    By the time she was 16, she had embarked on an affair with Mr Hussain, who was then 20 and already married.


    The teenager's body was found in this canal in Rotherham, Yorkshire


    The teenager's body was found in this canal in Rotherham, Yorkshire.


    She gave birth to a daughter in June last year, but Mr Hussain refused to accept that the child was his.
    Four months later, and just days before she was murdered on October 12, she ‘shamed’ Asghar and Mr Hussain by informing their families of her relationship with both men.
    She told Asghar’s mother she loved her son and ‘wanted to have babies’ by him. But Mrs Asghar was furious and attempted to hit Miss Wilson with a shoe, branding her ‘a dirty white bitch’ who should ‘keep your legs closed’, the trial was told.
    Nicholas Campbell QC, prosecuting, said that in subsequent text messages Asghar mounted ‘a mission to kill Laura Wilson’. 
    Asghar and Mr Hussain had decided that Miss Wilson was ‘a loose cannon and they had to get rid of her’, Sheffield Crown Court was told.
    Asghar then lured her to a late-night meeting by the Sheffield and Keadby Canal near her home and stabbed her several times. One wound was seven inches deep.
    Rotherham Safeguarding Children Board, which co-ordinates agency work, undertook a serious case review after Miss Wilson’s murder but its findings have not been published.
    Earlier this year, the issue of vulnerable white girls being targeted by Asian men for sex prompted Jack Straw, the former home secretary, to claim some British Pakistani men regard white girls as ‘easy meat’.
    He spoke out after two Asian men who raped girls in Derby were given indefinite jail terms. 
    ‘We need to get the Pakistani community to think much more clearly about why this is going on and to be more open about the problems that are leading to a number of Pakistani heritage men thinking it is OK to target white girls in this way,’ he said.

    Tuesday, December 20, 2011

    Going To The Chapel and I'm Gonna Get Married


    It’s time to criminalise forced marriage


    Charlotte Rachael Proudman







    The Independent
    The number of forced marriages is rising every year in the UK. The Government’s Forced Marriage Unit alone dealt with 1735 cases in 2010. 70.9% of these involving families of Pakistani, Indian and Bengali background. 86% of victims were female and 35% were under 18. Of course, the Forced Marriage Unit’s figures do not reflect the full scale of the abuse, as many cases go unreported.
    Forced marriage is an appalling and indefensible practice which is recognised in the UK as a form of violence against women and men, a serious abuse of human rights and, where a minor is involved, child abuse.  Yet forced marriage is not illegal in the UK.
    Concern for victims of forced marriage led to the Forced Marriage (Civil Protection) Act 2007, which provides a specific civil remedy called a Forced Marriage Protection Order (FMPO).  FMPOs play an important role in protecting victims of a threatened or actual forced marriage from their families, although organisations working with victims of forced marriage report that breaches are common.   In May of this year the Home Affairs Select Committee recommended that the government make forcing someone to marry a crime.  In October the Prime Minister announced plans to do just that, and a public consultation on making forced marriage a specific criminal offence launched last week. I fully support the government’s plans.
    Prior to practicing as a family law pupil at Coram Chambers, I undertook research into forced marriage at Cambridge University during 2010-2011.  I interviewed women from South Asian communities, several of whom were survivors of forced marriage.  Having repeatedly heard that victims of forced marriage do not want to criminalise perpetrators of forced marriage, often their families, and that making forced marriage a crime will deter victims from coming forward, I was surprised to find that all of the women I spoke to were strongly in favour of criminalisation. In fact they appealed to me to put forward their views and ensure their voices are heard amongst saturated political and media rhetoric, which appears to have falsely portrayed their views.
    They argued that if forced marriage had been a criminal offence when they were forced to marry they would have used the law as a bargaining chip to negotiate with their parents.  They believed that a criminal penalty would act as a deterrent, and also argued that legislation would have a symbolic function in sending a message to perpetrators that forced marriage is socially unacceptable. All of the women I spoke to said they wanted recognition of their rights and of the wrong that had been inflicted on them, and demanded that bringing perpetrators to justice and protecting victims should be prioritised over concerns about demonising the communities which practice forced marriage.
    Those in opposition to criminalisation have argued that the criminal aspects of forced marriage – for example abduction, assault and rape – are already covered by existing criminal offences.  Yet these offences do not tackle the control, persuasion, pressure, manipulation and threats that many women experience over time, and they do not offer justice to all – or even to many – victims of forced marriage.
    One woman I spoke to, Sami*, was taken to Bangladesh at the age of 17 and subjected to emotional and psychological pressure over a number of weeks in order to force her to marry her cousin.  Sami was told that the marriage was a duty to her parents and to God, and was warned that she would be rejected by her family and by the South Asian community if she did not go ahead with the marriage. When this failed her mother pretended to be ill, whilst her father held a knife to his throat. This immense pressure eventually led Sami to capitulate and enter into a forced marriage.
    Sami’s forced marriage would not be illegal under the existing criminal law.  Whereas annulment legislation in England and Wales and the Forced Marriage (Civil Protection) Act 2007 recognise psychological, financial and emotional coercion as forced marriage, criminal legislation does not.  This gap can only be remedied by introducing a specific criminal offence of forced marriage which encompasses a range of coercive behaviours.  Other countries have already done this.  For instance, the Norwegian Criminal Code defines forced marriage as involving “recourse to violence, deprivation of liberty, undue pressure or other unlawful behaviour, or through the threat of such behaviour”.
    Criminalisation of forced marriage will make it easier to take action against perpetrators, rather than making use of a patchwork of laws that are not specifically designed to tackle forced marriage, and it may also challenge the attitudes of those who perceive coercion – whether emotional, physical, financial or otherwise – to be acceptable.
    Alongside a specific criminal offence of forced marriage, more must be done to challenge the practice within communities and to support victims. Increased funding is needed for groups such as the Iranian and Kurdish Women’s Rights Organisation, which works with victims of forced marriage and campaigns for a tougher response by government and by statutory bodies such as schools.
    Many women who are victims of forced marriage feel terribly let down by our Government. It’s time for the Government to stop abrogating its responsibility and to safeguard the rights of women by making forced marriage a specific criminal offence.
    *not the interviewee’s real name
    Charlotte’s book ‘Forced and Arranged Marriage Among South Asian Women in England and Wales: Critically Examining the Social & Legal Ramifications of Criminalisation’ is availlable on Amazon.co.uk

    Sunday, November 27, 2011

    Hey Christian ... Jesus Is S***T!


    Christian mother 'forced out of Heathrow job after hate campaign by Muslim fundamentalists'




    • I was told I would go to hell, claims worker
    • 'Muslims made fun of colleague wearing crosses'
    • Lost job after speaking out about 'extremist' bullying
    A worker who claims she was the victim of a race-hate campaign by fundamentalist Muslims because of her Christian beliefs has launched a  landmark case against her former employers.
    Nouhad Halawi, a saleswoman at Heathrow Airport's World Duty Free shop, said she and other Christian staff were systematically harassed by Muslims.
    She alleged the intimidation included:
    Mrs Halawi lost her job at the perfume counter in Terminal 3 in July after 13 years when she spoke out about bullying by a small group of 'extremist' Muslims at the airport.
    The mother-of-two had been the subject of a complaint by an Islamic colleague but when she raised her own concerns as a Christian, she said she was the one who was dismissed.
    Her case for unfair dismissal is being supported by the Christian Legal Centre, who believe it raises important legal issues over whether Muslims and Christians are treated differently by employers.
    Shopping: One of the World Duty Free stores at Heathrow. Mrs Halawi was a perfume saleswoman for 13 years
    Mrs Halawi, 47, who came to Britain from Lebanon in 1977, said: 'I have been sacked on the basis of unsubstantiated complaints.
    'There is now great fear amongst my former colleagues that the same could happen to them if one of the Muslims turns on them.
    'This is supposed to be a Christian country, but the law seems to be on the side of the Muslims.'
    She says that she had always got on well with her Muslim colleagues,but  the atmosphere changed with a growing number of employees promoting 'fundamentalist Islam'.
    Mrs Halawi told the Sunday Telegraph: 'One man brought in the Koran to work and insisted I read it and another brought in Islamic leaflets and handed them out to other employees.

    'They say that Jesus is s***** and bullied a Christian friend of mine so much for wearing her crosses that she came to me crying'

    'They said that 9/11 served the Americans right and that they hated the West, but that they had come here because they want to convert people to Islam.
    'They say that Jesus is s***** and bullied a Christian friend of mine so much for wearing her crosses that she came to me crying.'
    She claimed she became a targeted for the fundamentalists after she stood up for her friend who wants to be anonymous because she still works at the terminal.
    In May, five of her Muslim colleagues complained to David Tunnicliffe, the trading manager at World Duty Free, accusing her of being anti-Islamic following a heated conversation in the store.
    According to the Telegraph, her description of a Muslim colleague as an allawhi - 'man of God' in Arabic -  sparked a row when another worker overheard the remark and thought she said Alawi, which was his branch of Islam.
    Heathrow: Complaint of religious discrimination by a sacked worker in Terminal 3
    Following the complaints she was suspended but was not told on what  grounds until she met Mr Tunnicliffe in July.
    Two days after the meeting she received a letter withdrawing her Heathrow security pass - needed to work at World Duty Free - because her comments were deemed 'extremely inappropriate.'
    Mrs Halawi, paid at World Duty Free on a freelance basis by cosmetic staff agency Caroline South Associates, was told that she would not be unable to continue working without her pass.
    A petition signed by 28 colleagues, some of them Muslims, argued that she has been dismissed on the basis of 'malicious lies.'
    The Christian Legal Centre has instructed Paul Diamond, a leading human rights barrister, to represent Mrs Halawi in taking both Caroline South Associates and Autogrill Retail UK Limited, which trades as World Duty Free, to an employment tribunal.
    A lawyer acting for CSA told the Sunday Telegraph: 'The case is still pending so the company is not in a position to comment, but as far as the company is concerned she's never been an employee and has never been dismissed.'
    A World Duty Free spokesman said they were unable to comment because of  'ongoing legal proceedings'.
    Last week, Jewish businessman Arieh Zucker complained that he has been repeatedly singled out for full-body scans by Muslim security staff at the airport.
    The 41-year-old mortgage broker, from London, has accused them of 'race hate' and is threatening to sue for racial discrimination after being made to 'feel like a criminal' while being scanned.

    ... and Now A Message From The EDL: Britain Is Not A Muslim Country

    Death to England ... (Again)


    Iran expels Britain's ambassador to Tehran calling 'death to England'

    Iran erupted in a fresh frenzy of animosity towards its old imperial foe on Sunday as MPs chanting "death to England" voted to expel Britain's ambassador to Tehran and threatened his mission with a reprise of the 1979 hostage crisis.


    Dominic Chilcott, who took up the position of ambassador just a month ago, could be forced to leave the country within weeks after a motion to downgrade Iran's diplomatic ties with Britain was passed overwhelmingly by the Islamist republic's parliament.
    The step was taken after Britain, Canada and the United States announced fresh sanctions against Iran last week in the wake of a report by UN weapons inspectors which provided the most compelling case yet that Tehran is trying to build a nuclear bomb.
    Britain was singled out, however, after it became the first state to impose direct sanctions on Iran's central bank. Financial institutions in the City were also banned from doing business with their Iranian counterparts.
    Despite pressure from Israel, Washington has baulked at following suit, arguing that such a step would cause deep financial pain for ordinary Iranians and could cause the price of oil to soar. If its central bank faced widespread international sanctions, Iran would find it virtually impossible to import and export oil, food and other commodities except on the black market.
    It is the first time in the UK's postwar history that Britain has imposed a total boycott on the entire banking industry of a foreign state.
    Iranian MPs were incandescent in their fury towards Britain, known by many in Iran as "the Old Fox". After announcing that the motion had been carried by 171 votes to three, Ali Larijani, the hawkish speaker, warned that even tougher penalties would be imposed on Britain, saying: "this is just the beginning of the road."
    The resolution, which declared the British government to be "worse than the devil", must now be approved by Iran's Guardian Council. It is unlikely that the body's spiritual elders, whose main role is to ensure that legislation cannot be deemed un-Islamic, would block the move.
    Once the council has bestowed its blessing, Mr Chilcott would be ejected from the country and Iran's ambassador to London recalled. The respective missions would be run at charge d'affaires level, as they were just a few months ago. More Here ... The Telegraph

    Friday, November 25, 2011

    English Defence League prepares to storm local elections

    English Defence League to enter electoral politics after signing pact with British Freedom Party

    The IndependantThe English Defence League plans to field candidates for the first time in local elections after an alliance is finalised between the far-right group and the British Freedom Party, which was set up by disgruntled members of the British National Party.
    Senior figures said that the EDL, which has become known for its protests in English towns with Muslim populations, needed to "detoxify" its name by moving into politics with an existing party. Their new partners hope to capitalise on the EDL's ability to mobilise a large number of supporters.
    Both groups will retain a measure of independence but will support each other. EDL members will be invited to join the newly affiliated political wing and stand as candidates under its name. "There is a gentleman's agreement in place, we are looking at the EDL becoming political early next year," said Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, the leader of the far-right group. Mr Yaxley-Lennon, who also goes by the name Tommy Robinson, confirmed he had met the British Freedom Party leader Paul Weston and that discussions were at an advanced stage.
    Mr Weston confirmed the plans and revealed he would offer Mr Yaxley-Lennon a place on the party's executive committee. He added: "We are going to say we support the principles of the EDL. We will get a lot of people who can stand in local constituencies and they will get a genuine political party in return."
    The move is likely to meet with some resistance from those EDL members who want to see the group remain a "street movement". Mr Yaxley-Lennon acknowledged the issue, saying he will consult the leaders of the group's local divisions.
    Dr Matthew Goodwin, a specialist on far-right politics, thought the move would receive significant support within the EDL "simply because Mr Yaxley-Lennon is the main face of the movement". He said: "It's difficult to tell at this point as the EDL has a very fluid membership structure. It is not the case, for example, that you ever really join the EDL. There are no official entrance mechanisms."
    Babs Davis, an EDL member, backed the move if the leadership thought it was in the best interests of the group. "A lot of people have said that we should go political but the movement never really wanted to do it," she said.
    "If that is what Tommy Robinson thinks is the right thing to do, then I agree with him. I think he has done a brilliant job. The whole point of being in the EDL is to follow what the leadership says."
    Dr Goodwin, who is a professor at the University of Nottingham, said: "Since the widespread defeat for the BNP in last year's general election, the far right-wing landscape of British politics has seen the emergence of several small political parties and movements, all attempting to fill the gaps left by Nick Griffin's party and exploit wider public concerns about immigration."
    He said at least 45 per cent of voters refused to back any of the main parties on immigration, leaving "clear potential" for a far-right group.
    Dr Goodwin added: "Having passed through its embryonic stage, the EDL is now very much at a crossroads: it can either remain as a confrontational streets-based social movement, or it can attempt to transform itself into a radical right-wing political party. This shift will require members and money.
    "It has also developed links with far more successful radical right parties in other European states, that may pass on successful strategies and tips."
    The former BNP member is the founder and leader of the EDL. He has recently forged a strong relationship with British Freedom Party leader Paul Weston.
    He is known for wearing a St George's Cross mask when making public appearances and was one of two EDL members who protested on the roof of FIFA's Zurich offices about the attempt by world football's governing body to ban England players from wearing poppies during a recent match. Earlier this month he received a 12-week sentence for assault, suspended for a year, at Preston magistrates' court.
    Paul Weston
    A former electoral candidate for UKIP, Mr Weston is described by Mr Yaxley-Lennon as a "charismatic public-schoolboy type".
    He took over the chairmanship of the British Freedom Party two weeks ago. Like many of the party's founders, he is said to be an experienced political campaigner. He is thought to want to keep his party free from the "historical baggage associated with parties such as the BNP".
    The EDL by numbers
    2,000 The number of people thought to have attended an EDL march in Blackburn, at which leader Tommy Robinson head-butted a fellow member.
    26,000 The number of people who "Like" the EDL on Facebook.
    172 The number of EDL members arrested at the group's last march, on Whitehall in London.

    Tuesday, November 22, 2011

    Rape: It's The White Girls Fault!

    It's Because The White Girls Tend To Make Themselves Look Slutty ... The Pakistani Girls Don't Do That!


    From YouTube:

    Uploaded by EruditeConcepts on Nov 20, 2011
    A Muslim gang of 'sexual predators' cruised city streets for girls as young as 12 - usually white - who were then plied with drink and drugs and raped or abused.
    Up to 100 'vulnerable' girls may have been groomed, abused or supplied cocaine by married fathers Abid ­Saddique and Mohammed Liaqat, and their friends.

    A court heard the pair used Liaqat's BMW saloon to trawl for victims, pulling up alongside girls outside shops or schools and chatting them up before a 'campaign of calls and texts' to groom them.

    Unemployed Liaqat, of Sinfin, Derby, was convicted of rape, aiding and abetting rape, being involved with child pornography, two sexual assaults, four counts of sexual activity with a child, and affray.
    Of the other defendants, Akshay Kumar, 38, Faisal Mehmood, 24, Mohamed Imran Rehman, 26, Ziafat Yasin, 31, and Graham Blackham, 26 - a convicted sex offender who was the only non-Asian member of the gang to face a judge - have already been jailed after being convicted of a string of sex or drug offences.


    Liaqat's brother, Naweed, 33, and Farooq Amed, 28, pleaded guilty to perverting the course of justice and were both jailed for 18 months.


    Convictions were achieved in relation to 15 of the 26 victims across the three trials.
    Saddique and Liaqat will be sentenced at Nottingham Crown Court in January.
    A Serious Case Review by Derby Safeguarding Children Board is due to be published about the case imminently.


    One victim, who was raped in a car after being driven to a country lane by Liaqat and a second man, told how she was targeted aged 16 after telling the men she came from a broken home.
    She said: 'They would take you out, buy you ice creams and take you out for a lovely nice meal. And there's part of you that thinks it's really exciting and there's part of you that thinks, "I have met this lovely nice man and he's taking me out for a really nice meal".

    Sunday, November 20, 2011

    Newspaper Does Some Islamic Terrorist Street Cleaning

    21/7 terrorist Siraj Ali back behind bars after Sunday Mirror investigation

    Fanatical 21/7 terrorist Siraj Ali was back behind bars last night thanks to a Sunday Mirror
    investigation.
    Counter-terrorism officers swooped on the hate-filled extremist, 35, after we handed over damning
    evidence that he was taking drugs inside a bail hostel.
    Ali — graded as the highest possible risk to the public — was recalled to prison after he tested
    positive for marijuana and will now spend the rest of his nine-year sentence in jail.
    Send Be the first
    The recall is a massive coup for counter-terrorism officers who were so concerned about Ali being
    back on the streets that they put him under round-the-clock surveillance. He was on an MI5 list of
    people under watch and the cost of monitoring him for the next few years would have run into
    millions.
    The bomber was jailed for 12 years, reduced to nine on appeal, for helping a gang of five Al Qaeda
    suicide bombers in their bid to repeat the carnage of July 7, 2005, two weeks later.


    Ali, who is foster brother of failed 21/7 bomber Yassin Omar and a friend of ringleader Muktar Said
    Ibrahim, knew about the planned bombings and helped the would-be suicide killers clear up their
    explosives factory.
    The judge who jailed him said that the sentence he was allowed to give him was “woefully
    inadequate” as Ali had wanted his accomplices to kill hundreds.
    The Sunday Mirror revealed earlier this year that he had been released after half his sentence.
    There was a national outcry when a judge ruled he could not be deported back to his native Eritrea
    because he could face “inhumane treatment or punishment”.
    But a Sunday Mirror investigation has put Ali back where he belongs – in a top-security jail for
    years to come.
    The news that he is back behind bars was hailed last night by the terror chief who was in charge
    of hunting the 21/7 gang behind the bungled attempt to blow up three packed Tube trains and a
    bus.
    Last month an associate of Aliʼs approached the Sunday Mirror, claiming the terrorist had been
    using drugs since his release – a flagrant breach of his strict licence conditions. Our probe
    obtained video footage in which Ali appeared to boast about smoking drugs and suggested he was
    taking heroin.
    He also expressed his fear of being searched by staff at the hostel, in NorthWest London.
    In one 31-second film, Ali can be seen smoking in a doorway between the hostelʼs kitchen and the
    garden.
    Asked if he is smoking marijuana, Ali replies: “No, itʼs B” (which is short for brown, street slang for
    heroin).
    In a second video, Ali asks a fellow resident three times about the hostelʼs search regime. He
    looks relieved after the other man tells him he does not believe staff are allowed to carry out strip
    searches of hostel residents.
    Ten days ago our investigators met detectives from the Metʼs counter-terrorism unit and handed
    over our evidence.
    Counter-terror and probation chiefs met this week to assess the videos, then decided to launch
    their own operation. Police raided the hostel on Friday and ordered Ali to take a drugs test, which
    showed positive for marijuana. He was immediately recalled to one of Britainʼs toughest jails.
    A source said: “He had a very set routine and tight curfews because he was a high-risk terrorist.
    “He didnʼt go out much but when he did he was very reluctant to talk about who he was seeing or
    what he was doing.
    “He would sit in the hostel and eat curries and other food made for him by someone in his family.
    Then most evenings, between 11pm and midnight, he would light up a spliff with one of the other
    residents.
    “Then he was boasting about smoking B, which most people would take to mean heroin.”
    Under the Criminal Justice Act 1991, criminals released from prison under licence are recalled if
    they carry out any illegal act. Ali was under a strict curfew, had to report to a police station every
    day, was not allowed to use the internet or associate with known al-Qaeda sympathisers.
    Former Assistant Commissioner Peter Clarke, who led the hunt for the bombers, praised the
    Sunday Mirrorʼs actions in getting Ali recalled.
    He said: “This is an excellent example of the media, the probation service and police working
    together in the public interest.
    “This is a man who knew about a plot to kill members of the British public. Not only did he not stop the terrorists but he positively aided them.”
    Harry Fletcher, assistant general secretary of probation officers union Napo, said: “The Sunday
    Mirror has shown that Ali has breached his licence and as a result he was immediately recalled to
    jail.
    “There have been 125 terrorist convictions in the last few years and over half of those have been
    released.
    “The cost of surveillance on these people is enormous and monitoring Ali would have cost
    thousands of pounds every week. Many like Ali are seen as high-risk but with budget cuts there
    are not enough people to monitor them in the community.

    Saturday, November 19, 2011

    Don't Litter Pamphlets Offend Muslims


    BINNED: Anti-litter poster that was an 'insult to Muslims'

    MailOnline
    A Labour council was at the  centre of a race row last night after printing a leaflet targeted at  Muslims that invoked the name  of Allah in urging them to stop  littering the streets.
    Bradford City Council was accused of inciting racial hatred by publishing leaflets that showed rubbish-strewn pavements – and appeared to place the blame on Muslims.
    The pamphlet, titled ‘Be proud of your environment’, used the Koran to lecture them about breaking the law and making a ‘horrible’ mess of the city. 

    Offence: Bradford City Council (pictured) said a well-intentioned junior official came up with the idea to print the leaflets
    It said: ‘We should respect Allah’s creations and the environments they live in. We should not act with ungratefulness by treating our surroundings with disrespect and throwing litter.’ 
    It was aimed at an area of the city boasting a high concentration of Muslims and which the council says has a problem with messy streets. 

    'The pamphlet said: ‘Muslims are able to pray anywhere in the world . . . we always have to keep our place of prayer clean – so why not start with the streets and neighbourhoods that we live in?’

    Conservative councillor John Robertshaw said he was ‘mortified’ to discover 16,000  of the ‘full-colour, glossy’ leaflets.
    ‘If these had gone out, the council could have been charged with inciting racial hatred, suggesting that litter dropping is exclusive to, or more  prevalent among, Muslims,’ he said.

    Answers: The council's Conservative opposition councillors are demanding an explanation for the printing of the leaflets

    ‘A leaflet encouraging people not  to drop litter, specifically targeting believers in Islam, is so outrageous that I still find it hard to believe that this has happened. 

    'What next? Leaflets to individually alienate our Christian, Hindu and Buddhist residents?’
    Last night, Ian Greenwood, the Labour leader of the council, admitted the idea had been insensitive and said that the leaflets had been withdrawn. 
    He told The Mail on Sunday a ‘well-intentioned’ junior official came up with the idea.
    ‘It was stopped by senior officials who realised it would cause offence.’

    Just Say No To FGM



    The controversial tradition at the heart of African culture has now reached the shores of Europe. Today, over 500 British girls are estimated to have undergone the procedure of female genital cutting.

    Many young girls would get excited at the prospect of going on holiday but Jamelia knew that the plane she boarded was taking her to be 'circumcised'. Jamelia was cut in an empty mansion by an old woman, strangers held her down and a clean razor was only used when more money exchanged hands. "I remember the blood everywhere", Jamelia says, "one of the maids actually saw her pick up the bit of flesh they cut out." Miriam's womb was accidentally sealed when she was cut and now she cannot have children. "It will stay with me until the day I die." Now, the NHS confirms that cutters are flown over to the UK to cut girls in batches - a cheap alternative. The UK has more girls at risk of bring cut than any other European country and as yet no-one has been prosecuted for the crime. 

    See Also: The Guardian

    Note To Self: Don't Get Sick ... And Never Go To A Hospital!


    Muslim staff escape NHS hygiene rule

    Muslim doctors and nurses are to be allowed to opt out of strict hygiene rules introduced by the NHS to restrict the spread of hospital superbugs.
    Muslim doctors and nurses are to be allowed to opt out of strict hygiene rules introduced by the NHS to restrict the spread of hospital superbugs. 
    Female staff who follow the Islamic faith will be allowed to cover their arms to preserve their modesty despite earlier guidance that all staff should be "bare below the elbow".
    The Department of Health has also relaxed rules prohibiting jewellery so that Sikh members of staff can wear bangles linked with their faith, providing they are pushed up the arm while the medic treats a patient.
    The Mail on Sunday reported the change had been made after female Muslims objected to being required to expose their arm below the elbow under guidance introduced by Alan Johnson when he was health secretary in 2007.
    The rules were drawn up to reduce the number of patients who were falling ill, and even dying, from superbugs such as MRSA and Clostridium difficile.
    Revised guidance which relaxed the requirements for some religions was published last month.
    Some Muslim staff and those from other groups may be allowed to use disposable plastic over-sleeves which cover their clothes below the elbow and allow the skin to remain covered up.
    Derek Butler, chairman of MRSA Action UK, said: "My worry is that allowing some medics to use disposable sleeves you compromise patient safety because unless you change the sleeves between each patient, you spread bacteria.
    "Scrubbing bare arms is far more effective."
    A Department of Health spokesman said: "The guidance is intended to provide direction to services in how they can balance infection control measures with cultural beliefs without compromising patient safety.

    Wednesday, November 16, 2011

    Marriage? ... No, This is a Modern Slave Trade


    As 8,000 British girls a year are forced to wed against their will, why we MUST confront this taboo

    When 13-year-old Sameem Ali was offered a reward for doing household chores — a holiday with her extended family on the other side of the world — she was overjoyed. 
    Still a child, Sameem imagined sandcastles and a beach to play on. The reality was very different. When she travelled from her family home in Moss Side, an inner-city suburb of Greater Manchester, she found herself in a small Pakistani village with no electricity and no running water. 
    It was then that her mother told her she was there to marry a man twice her age whom she had seen only once at a family get-together in Pakistan. 
    Forced union: Thousands of British girls are are made to marry men who could be twice their age and who they may have never met before saying 'I do' (posed by models)
    Forced union: Thousands of British girls are are made to marry men who could be twice their age and who they may have never met before saying 'I do' (posed by models)
    ‘At first, I thought she was joking,’ says Sameem, who is now in her late 20s. ‘Then I thought, “I’m only 13, I can’t get married”.’
    On the day of the wedding, her future husband’s family arrived in their best clothes. Sameem was pulled out of bed and given a creased red traditional wedding robe to wear. Her mother told her not to make a scene. 
    Under Islamic wedding rules, the bride and groom are married in separate rooms or in an area divided by a curtain. So Sameem’s relatives quickly combed her hair and pushed her into a room where the local mosque’s imam was waiting for her. He told her to repeat after him some words in a  foreign language she did not understand.
    She says now: ‘Minutes later, my mother walked in and said I was married.’
    Sameem was only allowed to return to the UK (with her husband) when she became pregnant with their son. ‘My family and his thought that if I had a British-born baby that would strengthen his case to come to this country,’ she says. 
    A few years later, back in Britain and helped by a friend, she ran away from her husband and started a new life in secret with her child. But her family came looking for her to take her home to her husband. 
    One day the police knocked on Sameem’s door to say that they had just arrested three people with her address in their pockets and weapons in the boot of their car. 
    ‘They said that my brother had paid the three men £50 each to kidnap me and my son by any means possible. If the police had not intervened I am sure I would have ended up dead.’
    Sameem has since written a book called Belonging about her experiences, and it is only now that forced marriages are finally being discussed openly having been a taboo subject for years. 

    'He told me I was his wife and I had to sleep with him. When I tried to refuse and said we needed to get to know each other first, he hit me’
    These barbaric unions are on the rise among second and third  generation immigrants from South Asia and the Middle East — used to keep money and property in the family (which is why cousins are compelled to wed) and in some cases as a cynical device to get a UK visa for a relative. 
    Those who refuse their family’s wishes have become the victims of horrific ‘honour’ crimes — including murder, violence and sexual assault. Those who run away from the weddings are often ostracised by their relatives for ever. 
    Prime Minister David Cameron has condemned forced marriage as ‘little more than slavery’, saying it is a problem we should not shy away from because of cultural concerns. His views are endorsed by Home Secretary Theresa May, who is investigating if those who organise forced marriages should face criminal charges — as in Germany, France, and Norway. Last year, the Government’s Forced Marriage Unit received 1,735 pleas for help from victims. 
    While most were female, 14 per cent were male. Hundreds were teenagers aged 15 to 18, but some were as young as nine. The Department for Education  estimates 8,000 British girls (the majority from Muslim and Hindu communities) enter a forced  marriage every year.
    Escaped: Sameem Ali ran away from an arranged marriage. Her family would have killed her for it had police not intervened
    Escaped: Sameem Ali ran away from an arranged marriage. Her family would have killed her for it had police not intervened
    Under rules introduced four years ago, victims can seek a special protection order to halt the wedding. Those who contravene the civil court order (such as parents) face a fine, six months’ imprisonment or both. 
    Stiffer criminal penalties were dropped by Labour in 2004 when ministers claimed they would be ‘resented as an intrusion into minority cultures and religions’. The Muslim Council of Britain complained that it would lead to the stigmatisation of immigrant communities. 
    And there the matter rested. But an increase in forced  marriages — and crimes used to enforce them — has led to the demand for tougher laws. 
    One campaigner, former Yorkshire MP Ann Cryer, says: ‘Protection is better than cure. . .  we need to be clear we are talking about girls being raped.’
    During this investigation, the Mail spoke to charity workers, health visitors, and women’s groups working in immigrant communities. 
    Only a few of them were  prepared to be named, fearing repercussions for discussing what is — astonishingly — seen as a  cultural norm and a private  matter within families. Many said that forced marriages lead to myriad problems, including deeply unhappy couples and bigamy (when a man takes an illegal second wife of his own choosing).  
    And it isn’t just women who are forced into marriage — hundreds of young British men are also rebelling at being pressured into sexual unions with virtual strangers. 
    The stories from victims of both sexes are horrifying. 
    This week I spoke to a 29-year-old Iranian girl working and studying in London, whom we will call Soraya. She is afraid to use her real name because she is in hiding from the brutal husband she was forced to marry just a few months ago.
    Soraya came to Britain 18 months ago on a student visa — sent by her parents, who live near Tehran. Although she was getting financial help from her father, she earned extra money by working in a hairdressers in north London. And, it was there — one day in May this year — that an Iranian woman approached her and said her 34-year-old brother was looking for a bride.

     'The mother told her daughter that if she did not consummate the marriage, she would "tie her to the bed, blindfold her and strip her", and then watch to make sure her daughter had sex with her new husband'
    Soraya told me: ‘She introduced me to her brother and we all went to bars and restaurants three times. I didn’t like him from the moment I saw him. He had a strange manner and behaviour.’
    But when Soraya told her mother in Iran about the introduction, her family took it all very seriously. Within weeks the man’s family and her own forced her into marriage. Her father threatened to cut Soraya off without funds if she refused to wed the man, and her mother begged her to go ahead for the sake of the family’s honour.
    So in June this year — although she had never met the man alone and had only spoken to him on a handful of occasions — they  married and Soraya moved into a flat with her new husband.
    ‘He raped me that night,’ she says simply. ‘He told me I was his wife and I had to sleep with him. When I tried to refuse and said we needed to get to know each other first, he hit me.’ 
    A few weeks ago, Soraya ran away from her husband, and went straight to the police. Soraya discovered that the man she had married was a schizophrenic who had wild moods, threatened her and wanted to keep her prisoner in the flat.  
    She says: ‘His family knew that he was mentally ill and were desperate to find him a wife. He works illegally in Britain and I think they thought that by marrying me it would help him get the papers to stay in this country.’
    Her parents, angry that she has left her husband, refuse to speak to her and have cut off her allowance. She has no idea what the future holds and is getting advice from the London-based charity, the Iranian and Kurdish Women’s Rights Organisation, which counsels those forced into such marriages. 
    Victims like Soraya may be fortified by a 2009 landmark case in which a Manchester mother was jailed for three years for forcing her daughter to marry her first cousin in Pakistan. 
    The mother told her daughter that if she did not consummate the marriage, she would ‘tie her to the bed, blindfold her and strip her’, and then watch to make sure her daughter had sex with her new husband.
    Passing sentence, Judge Clement Goldstone QC said ‘the forcing of a child into marriage against his or her wish will not be tolerated’. 
    He added: ‘Where a forced marriage leading to consummation is accompanied by threats of violence and is tantamount to cruelty the punishment will be more severe.’
    His stand — so close to the  Government’s own now — must surely be welcomed for the sake of thousands of victims of a cruel and outdated practice which has no place in modern Britain.

    Tuesday, November 15, 2011

    We Must Drain the Poison of Antisemitism


    Baroness Warsi gave the 2011 European Institute for the Study of Antisemitism Lecture

    Conservative Party chair Baroness Sayeeda Warsi has called it “abhorrent that some people actually believe that antisemitism does not exist in the world today.”
    Speaking at the European Institute for the Study of Antisemitism Lecture at the House of Commons, Baroness Warsi said: “The Jewish people are at once targeted by the far left and the far right.And they are at once branded superior and inferior by those who seek to attack them. It just shows how serious this problem is.
    “We must drain the poison of antisemitism from our country. As a Muslim, for me, Islamophobia is personal. But for me, Antisemitism is just as important.
    “Only recently a colleague of mine, Mike Freer MP was branded a 'Jewish homosexual pig' when he held a constituency surgery at his local mosque last month. He was attacked by a group formerly known as Muslim Against Crusades, Islam 4 UK, and Al Muhajiroun, a group of hate-filled individuals, whatever name they choose to adopt at any time who attacked me with eggs in Luton and whose leader tried to shout me down on Newsnight for not wearing a face veil.
    “My colleague, the Home Secretary banned them last week. My response is even less sympathetic: It’s probably the same response as I gave to their leader, Anjem Choudry, in 2009. If you can’t live by our values, get off our island.”
    She paid tribute to the work of Jewish Care and the Community Security Trust in protecting the Jewish community and to the Board of Deputies for standing up against antisemitism, and against Islamophobia, by banning of minarets in Switzerland, condemned the EDL for its anti-Muslim rhetoric and condemned the attack on a mosque in Israel.
    “I value my relationship with the Jewish community is because I deeply admire and respect their ongoing fight against bigotry,” she said. “I fundamentally believe no community has had to fight the battle as strongly and for as long as the Jewish community has.
    “If we really want to defeat racism and bigotry, if we’re serious about social harmony and if we’re actually going to destroy the scourge of antisemitism in this country, then we need all faiths and none to stand up against it, united.
    She called for a closer partnership between Jews and Muslims, “There’s nothing in our history which suggests that hatred between Muslim and Jews is inevitable.
    “Instead we should learn from history that there’s a slippery slope with discrimination, when one community is attacked, it’s only a matter of time before another is.”
    She also condemned “secular fundamentalism” calling it one of the “biggest threats we face in faith communities. And I am absolutely committed to defeating it.”

    Friday, November 11, 2011

    Banning "MAC" Incites Muslims

    Muslims Against Crusades (MAC) BANNED by Theresa May

    Background and Explanation of the Legislation:



    Religious Muslim's   Threat   Response to the Legislation:

    Britain Remembers



    From YouTube:

    Uploaded by IamBabcock on Nov 11, 2011
    Millions of people across the UK have fallen silent for two minutes to remember the nation's war dead on Armistice Day.

    In a ceremony at 11am at the Cenotaph in London, the Last Post was played by a bugler from the Coldstream Guards before wreaths were laid at the monument.

    The National Memorial Arboretum in Staffordshire hosted a Service of Remembrance within the walls of the striking Armed Forces Memorial.

    Thursday, November 10, 2011

    Dispatches: Muslim Rape Gangs In England

    American Renaissance

    Muslims Against Crusades Banned




    The organisation Muslims Against Crusades will be banned from operating in the UK from midnight, the Home Secretary has said.
    Theresa May said she was satisfied the group was "simply another name for an organisation already proscribed under a number of names" including Al Ghurabaa, The Saved Sect, Al Muhajiroun and Islam4UK.

    "The organisation was proscribed in 2006 for glorifying terrorism and we are clear it should not be able to continue these activities by simply changing its name," she said.

    Mrs May said on Thursday: "I have today laid an order which will proscribe Muslims Against Crusades from midnight tonight.

    "This means being a member of, or supporting the organisation, will be a criminal offence."
    Anjem Choudary, who describes himself as a press spokesman for the extremist group, said the decision was a "bid by the Government to cover up the truth".

    He said he did not know if a "Hell for Heroes" demonstration against Remembrance commemorations would now go ahead.

    Responding to the Government's announcement, he said: "I think it is an abject failure of democracy and it is a victory for Sharia Muslims. The truth is something the Government would rather silence."

    The demonstration was due to take place outside the Royal Albert Hall, the same location where a poppy was burned last year.

    No Muslims Against Crusades members were arrested in the build-up to the announcement from Mrs May.




    The home secretary, Theresa May, said she was satisfied Muslims Against Crusades was another name for an already banned organisation. 

    Photograph: PA

    The home secretary, Theresa May, has ordered Muslims Against Crusades, an Islamist group which is planning to disrupt Friday's Armistice Day ceremonies, be banned from midnight.
    The organisation, which burned two large poppies near the Royal Albert Hall in London on Remembrance Day during the minute's silence last year, is a renamed successor to the already banned Islam4UK and other proscribed organisations. Anjem Choudary is a leading figure in both groups.
    The immediate ban is part of the government's new drive to proscribe organisations that glorify terrorism in addition to those having direct links to terrorist groups.
    The ban will make membership of Muslims Against Crusades a criminal offence.
    May said: "I am satisfied Muslims Against Crusades is simply another name for an organisation already proscribed under a number of names including Al Ghurabaa, The Saved Sect, Al-Muhajiroun and Islam4UK. The organisation was proscribed in 2006 for glorifying terrorism and we are clear it should not be able to continue these activities by simply changing its name."
    A parliamentary order was laid at Westminster on Thursday morning implementing the ban.
    The group has often clashed with the English Defence League since it was set up last year. It has staged a pro-Bin Laden rally outside the US embassy. On the anniversary of 9/11 its members burned US flags and chanted through megaphones outside the embassy, disrupting a minute's silence by mourners at the nearby September 11 memorial garden.
    A statement on the group's website said this year's Armistice Day would be marked by "a total lack of silence" by the Muslim community in Britain to highlight the continuing "atrocities" in Iraq and Afghanistan and the "brutal torture concentration camps of Guantánamo Bay and Abu Ghraib".
    The "hell for heroes" protest planned for Friday was also scheduled to take place outside the Royal Albert Hall.
    The Home Office said the decision was based on an assessment of the group's involvement in the glorification of terrorism and the evidence that Muslims Against Crusades is another name for an already proscribed terrorist organisation.
    The ban, which has been evoked under the Terrorism Act 2000, also makes it a criminal offence to "arrange a meeting in support of a proscribed organisation, or to wear clothing, or to carry articles in public which arouse reasonable suspicion that an individual is a member or supporter of the proscribed organisation"..

    Wednesday, November 9, 2011

    Islamophobia: England ... Caveat Emptor!




    How is it racist to oppose a fascist ideology? 

    "In this scene from "Islamophobia," Tommy Robinson of the English Defence
League takes "Vanguard" correspondent on a tour of the neighborhood 
where he grew up, which he says has been taken over by radical 
Islamists. The drive quickly turns into a heated argument with a Muslim 
man passing by who recognizes Tommy."

    and BTW ... USA ... Caveat Emptor too!

    Poppy row: English Defence League climb onto roof of FIFA HQ


    The Mirror

    EDL protesters have climbed onto the roof of FIFA HQ


    FIFA were targeted today by protesters angry that they have banned England from wearing
    embroidered poppies on their team shirts on Saturday.

    Two members of the English Defence League climbed onto the roof of FIFA's headquarters in
    Zurich with a banner protesting against the ban.

    A FIFA spokesman confirmed the protest is ongoing and that Swiss police were in attendance.
    The two protesters displayed a banner with two poppies on which read: "English defence League.
    How dare FIFA disrespect our war dead and wounded. Support out troops."

    The incident will come as something of an embarrassment to the FA given that the EDL are a farright group whose founder Stephen Lennon was convicted in July of leading a street brawl with
    100 football fans.

    Lennon, a father of three from Luton, was sentenced to a 12-month community rehabilitation order,
    150 hours of unpaid work and given a three-year football banning order.


    A member of the EDL on the roof of FIFA (Pic: Twitter via casualsunited.wordpress.com)

    A spokesman for 'Hope not hate', an anti-EDL campaign group, said: "It's a little hypocritical of the
    EDL to be leading this protest given that their leader Stephen Lennon is a convicted football
    hooligan. It is important that neither the symbol of the poppy nor the Three Lions of England are
    appropriated by extremists of the EDL."

    David Cameron earlier condemned the ban on England's footballers wearing poppies on
    their kit as "outrageous"

    The Prime Minister called for the sport's ruling body, Fifa, to reverse the "absurd" decision that is
    stopping the team having the remembrance symbol embroidered on their shirts for this Saturday's
    match